Monday, October 11, 2010

Web Videos that are Made to Stick

This week was, again, very technical in nature.  Possibly my favorite part of Bourne's Web Video was the section on continuity.  In fact, I spent way too much time looking up continuity errors in my favorite movies stumbling upon blogs and short articles all over the internet about continuity errors (this is a good top 12 list ).  It just goes to show how closely people are paying attention sometimes.  And let me tell you, being a continuity director is not easy work.  I was continuity director on a weekend shoot in Charleston where it was really cold in the morning and blazing hot in the afternoon.  I had my little clipboard to write things down to ensure the continuity was correct, but I had a problem not with making sure the talent (and I use that term somewhat loosely) entered from the right direction and each item was discussed in each appropriate scene.  Instead, I had a problem convincing the talent to endure wearing a light jacket for each scene because, as is usual when shooting any type of video, the shots were out of chronological order and all needed to look uniform (i.e. all with or all without the jacket).  After much debate I realized it was a lost cause, so I checked my list and pinpointed exactly which scene we needed to see the talent take of the jacket and which scene the jacket needed to be put back on in order for the scenes to make sense without a jacket magically disappearing and reappearing.


The other section I found in this chapter of Web Video was the section on green screens.  One of the hardest lessons to learn by trial and error is the green screen lesson...or in my case the blue screen lesson.  I was told to make sure the subject didn't wear blue.  So I told her that she wasn't allowed to wear blue.  And she didn't.  What I didn't account for was her eye color.  You guessed it: blue.  When I took the blue background out, I didn't notice any difference in her eye color (mostly because I wasn't looking for any difference in her eye color).  However, when I went to put it a different background (in this case a black background with small silver bits "shimmering") I started watching and noticed something was happening with her eyes.  If only I had had this section to tell me to check the subject's eye color...


On to Heath and Heath's Made to Stick; I really enjoyed the chapter on credibility...especially the "Where's the beef?" section.  I don't know about anyone else, but I remember that commercial despite the fact that that particular campaign was launched the year before I was born...but I digress.  I never really thought about that campaign using credibility to sell the product.  I always assumed it was the cute, cantankerous old lady asking about the location of the beef.  Looking back I can see that they were indeed putting the credibility of the commercial in the hands of the consumer.  We can see that this is done a lot of times today.  For example, a lot of companies tell their consumers to "come on in and see for yourself" that x, y, z is true about the company, product, service, whatever.


The chapter on emotional resonated with me from the very start with Mother Theresa's quote about helping one, not a much larger group.  I find that this is true for just about everyone (especially beauty queens).  What I mean by this is that a majority of people from politicians to beauty queens to singer/songwriters are always talking about helping others and world peace, etc.  But it really does only start with one.  For example, I don't know how many of you have pets or go to Petsmart regularly, but I do.  I also see those commercials with Sarah McLachlan asking for donations to help all stray animals and animals and shelters.  That's a lot of animals.  But at Petsmart, you can help that one animal right there.  You can see the animal and touch the animal and you can help it.  I don't know about y'all, but I am more prone to give money every time I walk into Petsmart when they ask you at checkout because I know which animal my money is going to (or at least I like to think my money is going to help that animal right there...not some hypothetical animal an untold number of miles away).


This week there was a lot of reading and a lot of information to glean from all of this reading.  I know this is a somewhat superficial post about the reading, but I'm afraid if I go on much longer I'm going to go on forever.  Not to mention I'm sure someone else has already covered everything else I wanted to say and I'm sure no one wants to read duplicated posts if at all possible.  So I think I will end it there and try to post other ideas as comments should the need arise.

4 comments:

  1. Jessica,

    I think the link you posted may have changed -- now it's all about what the style of hair tells you about the person... haha but anyway! I got your point. :-)

    I cannot imagine having to study scenes like you did in order to tell the actress when to take the jacket off and/or put it back on. It almost gave me a headache reading about it! I say for our little video that we will produce for Ripple of One, we make sure the person has the same thing on ALL of the time to avoid any confusion.

    Your story about the blue screen made me laugh as well. I would have never thought about the color of the person's eyes! How crazy! Most of the time, even when a person's eyes are blue/green/brown/whatever, they're not that TRUE color, so you wouldn't think it'd matter, but you assured me that it does.

    Your comment regarding the Humane Society commercial with Sarah McLachlan was similar to my own posting about the Web site for Save the Children. They flash hundreds of children's faces across the bottom of the screen. They do give detailed information about each of the children so the reader can feel like he or she is getting to know the child that he or she is helping. However, I still think it's too much. It's like the Humane Society commercial showing hundreds of animals .. the sheer volume can get overwhelming for the potential giver, and then he or she doesn't care to give anymore. I think it would be much more effective with just two or three examples.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have a co-worker who is obsessed about continuity in sci-fi movies and news articles and any number of places. I've never worried too much about it unless it's glaringly obvious - different clothing in the same scene would probably fit that bill! Your story was actually much better for explaining the difficulties of maintaining continuity than the ten commandments given in Bourne.

    I've not seen the Humane Society video, but I have been overwhelmed by similar pleas. Sometimes, visual volume can be effective and drive home the magnitude of a problem - I'm thinking of the endless Katrina footage. However, what it did for me (Paula has a similar story) was make me look for a more personal way to connect. Someone in my high school class (I went to high school in a suburb of New Orleans but haven't lived there in over 20 years) set up a website with a chat board where people could share news and stories and photos. Someone with an intact house became a repository for donations, others offered temporary homes to displaced classmates and I doubt I was the only one who found sympathy and baby clothes for a class bully who lost everything. So the mass appeals got me started, but it was the personal level appeal that helped me act.

    All of this is bringing home the difficulties we're going to face in creating our own short web video. So far, I'm looking forward to it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Alright guys, link is fixed. Sorry about that!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Jessica,

    I enjoyed your blog this week. Very humorous and demonstrates your vast experience in the field. The eyes is something I would certainly miss as well. After reading this text I certainly am wary of keeping it consistent without having a very long clip. I am excited, yet nervous about our upcoming project. I suspect we will all be quoting Jennie Bourne in the end.

    ReplyDelete